What would you do differently ?
I wrote yesterday about how some law firms reportedly handled layoff or pay cut announcements. Some readers asked me how I'd handle the situation differently. Here are a few ideas:
- Don't cut employee compensation. Cutting associate pay makes no sense. Morale will plunge: some will leave, others will become discouraged. To achieve savings, develop a compensation package that replaces salary by a bonus if measurable targets are met. Partners need to explain how they too are cutting base compensation.
- Don't pay people not to work. The media report some prominent firms paying first-year associates to defer their start date or experienced associates to take a year off. But what about their skills? The media reports suggest that they don't matter, which is unproductive for either firms or individuals. If idled or under-occupied, associates should be assigned to projects that:
- have been identified by the firm as worthwhile;
- will develop associates' skills in measurable ways; and
- will develop the kind or quality of services the firm offers.
- Dissociate performance review from retention or compensation decisions. Firms need to be up-front about their motivations to preserve morale and to stand a chance of future business from an alumnus. They should not confuse individual (under-)performance with general economic constraints. Performance should include a broader metric than just hours billed; otherwise, associates risk passing on problems to billing partners.
- Make management accountable, with targets or standards that are disclosed and that must be met.
- All office communications should pass two tests:
- What would clients say if they read this?
- What would our competitors say if they read this?